Over the first two parts of this series, we looked at what VirtualATM's analytics reveal about ATM testing. In Part 1, we showed how the centralized Statistics and Reporting feature gives teams a single view of what tests ran, which ones passed or failed, and whether the testing automation capabilities are running on their own. In Part 2, we went a level deeper, looking at how extended transaction times can negatively impact the consumer experience at an ATM and why it is so important to capture and analyze step-by-step transaction timing comparisons after security patches, release upgrades and other changes, not just whether a transaction passed or failed.
Both blog articles answered the operational question: how is our testing going? This final installment in the series addresses the question senior management will eventually ask: are we getting value from our investment in testing automation?
This is certainly a fair question – one that is becoming more difficult to answer. All across the global payment ecosystem AI-assisted development is dramatically accelerating the pace of change, while testing capacity has largely stayed the same. Industry research suggests many organizations now release code without complete testing and experience critical software failures regularly. In the ATM channel, every defect that escapes into production risks downtime, compliance penalties, and most importantly the loss of customer trust.
The good news: the same data that tells you how your testing is going can also show the value that you are getting.
As we have shown in the first 2 blogs in this series, the first step in accurately measuring the value of your testing investment is choosing a tool like Paragon’s VirtualATM platform that automatically and accurately collects and collates relevant information in its database and presents it in clear, easy to access and understand reports. Following are two good examples of reports specifically designed to help measure value:
The Script Automation vs Intent Automation report compares traditional scripted automation with AI-driven intent automation. It shows run counts, success rates, average test duration, steps per run, daily trends, as well as a breakdown by virtual ATM. As teams adopt AI-assisted testing, they can see where it is adding real value and where traditional scripting might be a better option.
The Cost Analysis report estimates the time and money saved by automation. You get to set the baselines for your organization, e.g., how many minutes a test takes when performed manually and the fully loaded hourly cost of a tester, and VirtualATM applies them to the automated runs in any date range you choose. An optional industry-average comparison is available to provide an outside reference point. Because the inputs are yours, the calculations reflect your team’s expertise and your costs.
Paragon's valuation models start with a simple, traceable example: a single automated regression test run of 300 transactions across 10 ATMs. Here is how the baseline is built:
|
Measurement |
Manual testing |
VirtualATM automation |
|
Transactions executed |
300 |
300 |
|
Elapsed effort |
~15.0 hours |
~0.5 hours |
|
Capacity returned to the team |
— |
~14.5 hours |
|
Additional issues detected |
— |
3 of 300 transactions |
One regression run provides a useful illustration, but the bigger picture comes from looking at the whole team over time. Paragon's standard model uses a team of four ATM testers and assumes VirtualATM takes over 30% of their manual testing workload.
A thirty percent productivity gain for the four testers delivers an additional 1.2 testers' worth of time. In other words, the team gains the equivalent of more than one additional full-time tester — without adding headcount.
Other sources of value, such as expanded test coverage, automated audit evidence, reduced reliance on physical lab ATMs, and avoided production incidents, are calculated separately. That way, every number in the valuation traces back to a clearly stated assumption your own team can review and adjust.
The point of adding automation to increase efficiency and productivity is not to replace testers. It is to free up their time for higher-value work, such as:
Not all value shows up has hard dollars line items in a budget. Paragon helps customers think about value in three layers, from the tactical and observable to strategic:
|
Value layer |
What it shows |
Examples |
|
Direct savings |
Justifies the investment |
Reclaimed tester capacity, reduced lab hardware, fewer vendor service visits, automated reporting |
|
Operational gains |
Proves the productivity lift |
Parallel and 24/7 testing, expanded test coverage shorter regression cycles, faster project deliveries |
|
Strategic benefit |
Why this matters |
Better operational visibility, cost/risk management, keeping pace with AI-accelerated development |
VirtualATM automatically records who ran each test, when, and with what result. The Users and Audit dashboard views provide a picture of how the test environment is being utilized across the entire team.
This additional visibility gives managers the facts they need to make better decisions about staffing, capacity planning, platform adoption, testing efficiency, and productivity based on actual usage rather than guesses and estimates.
VirtualATM reports can be exported as CSV or PDF files that include test run counts, pass/fail totals, execution steps, and, where applicable, captured ATM screens and receipts. Project results can also be retrieved through the RESTful API.
That means that when an auditor, a payment network, or an internal risk team asks what was tested, when, and by whom, the answer is already in VirtualATM, ready to access, export, and deliver in minutes rather than being assembled in hours or days by digging through a paper trail (that may or may not actually exist).
The value of test automation orchestrated by a platform like VirtualATM reaches well beyond the ATM lab, from the budget conversation to your corporate roadmap:
Across all three blog articles, the message is the same: your ATM testing generates valuable information every day. VirtualATM captures it and turns it into actionable insights.
|
Series |
Question answered |
What VirtualATM provides |
|
Part 1 |
Detailed test results, is automation working? |
A single dashboard, per project and ATM views, scheduled reports, etc |
|
Part 2 |
How well do transactions actually perform? |
Timing baselines, step-by-step comparison, and failing-script insight |
|
Part 3 |
What is the value of automation? |
Cost Analysis, capacity modeling, governance, and on-demand evidence |
The bottom line: when testing can deliver real and measurable value, it stops being treated as a cost center and starts being recognized as a strategic necessity for ensuring the long-term success and profitability of the ATM channel. VirtualATM gives corporate leaders the data they need to make better business decisions.
Paragon Application Systems has focused our business exclusively on payments and ATM testing since 1994. Leading financial institutions, networks, and processors from across the globe rely on us to validate change and protect their brands.
VirtualATM records every test run, step, screen, receipt, and host message centrally, so the numbers behind your testing operation can be accurately tracked and managed. Experienced Paragon resources will work with you to design and implement a solution that meets your specific operational requirements and delivers real, long-term business value.
Start with Part 1: Your ATM Testing Already Knows the Answers, then read Part 2: Performance Baselines for Every Transaction on Every ATM.
Cost Analysis estimates the time and cost automation saves, using baselines you define. The Script Automation vs Intent Automation report compares scripted automation with AI-driven intent automation, showing test run counts, success rates, average duration, steps per run, a daily trend, and a breakdown by ATM.
From your own testing. Cost Analysis applies your manual-effort and hourly-cost baselines to the automated runs VirtualATM has actually recorded. Each additional value driver is calculated separately against a stated assumption your team can review.
No. It returns time to the team. In Paragon's example, one automated regression test run of 300 transactions across 10 ATMs takes about 30 minutes compared with about 15 hours manually, returning 14.5 hours of time that can be used to expand test coverage, improve defect analysis, or to bolster the organizations fraud defenses.
Paragon looks at three layers: direct savings that justify the investment, operational gains that prove the productivity lift, and strategic advantages that explain why it matters now. For example, a four-person team that shifts 30% of its manual work to automation can spend the recovered time focusing on other important areas like compliance, product innovation, etc.
Yes. Results and the associated metrics are automatically stored in the VirtualATM application database, so configurable reports in CSV or PDF format are readily accessible and available. Detailed result data can also be retrieved through the API.